Indie Film Live

Friday, January 20, 2006

Monitoring cineform HD for Filmout

This is a tricky one.

We have already spent a great deal of time with issues relating to filmout. Every time we think we are close to understanding it we get shot down. Sometiimme by reality, other time the smoke and mirrors that seems to engulf this topic.

We want to monitor our HD signal for two key purposes.

1. Live Capture on set to our wafian (if we don't calibrate our monitor here we stand to loose data we may not htink we need when monitoring the Video feed but which for filmout is essential - am I right in understanding this?)
2. For post and final filmout files.

We have hadexperience with the second option but all of that was with 10bit log film images within combustion whoch has look up table options.

A we understand it we need to get the entire production line conformed to a standard set of calibrations which - when printed to film are consistant. Then where LUT's are an available toolset, (like in combustion) we need to create our own LUT that allows us to monitor an output that emulates as close as possible what is on screen.

If anyone can assist us with ghetting the stup proces sright it would be greatly appreciated.

Simon

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Technical_02: Mobility

“Spoon” will have some scenes shot on two cameras simultaneously. Now we need to make a box (something like VT rack) to keep inside two 1000VA UPS’s and two “Wafian” boxes together. Must have mobility on the fly, be weather proof and be in separate parts in case unit A and unit B have to be in different locations on set. Long story short – does anybody know of a “Meccano” set for industrial use? It would be nice to be able to try out different possibilities. Each UPS is about 25kg and the whole system could add up to over 70kg. The two systems must be able to work as one mechanical unit or as two separate units as the need arises. There should be a patch board of some sort mounted on the rack so that somebody tripping over a cable only results in the cable pulling out of the patch board and not all the equipment landing on the floor. The UPS’s should be “direct” and not “in-line” so that we don’t have to worry about generator voltage jumps unless it is over 380V. We will keep you posted.

What we were really wondering is where we can get a military size helicopter to drop the VT operator with the equipment to the ocean for testing purposes and leave him there for a few hours to see if “Wafian” will survive any unsuspected situations on set.

By the way I have not introduced myself – My name is Pavel Orlov, I am the Technical Supervisor for project “Spoon” and System Administrator for “Atomic VFX” company.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

SPOON TEST FILES

Hi Everybody

Okay, okay... sorry for the delayed response. We've really had our heads down. You can see some of the questions I was going through with other users of the jvc HD 100camera at a blog here www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=56502

David I'm not 100% sure of the best way for us to make our shots available so I'm just going to post a test here and we can see if this works for everybody.

These are night/ rain/ ext. tests that we captured directly to the wafian box and captured at cineform. They're very rough but give an idea of what we're doing. Some details:

We shot loose comparative tests with a sony 750 hd camera with its standard lens and then on the jvc HD 100 with the ps teknik mini-35 adaptor so that we had some kind of standard, HD video reference point.

The jvc cam footage was captured directly to cineform using the wafain box. We weren't able to capture the the sony 750 directly to the box because of time constraints (we did get it working afterwards, so we can confirm that the box does work with a sony 750). As a result the sony 750 versions of the scenes went to HD tape first, and were then captured with cineform.

All the footage was then compressed to windows media 9. As you'll see, all the jvc cam stuff is soft - that is because we were ideally hoping to be able to sharpen it afterwards and shot with detail off on the camera. However we couldn't sharpen it nicely with any of the post tools that we have. Our subsequent testing with the detail setting to normal has given a sharp image that we're happy with. We have however noticed that when we shoot with detail setting on normal, we get some strange compression artifacts when we capture direct to cineform - i understand that andre has notified you of this and you guys are trying to work out what it could be.

Basically we either need to be able to shoot with detail on and capture okay, or come up with a way to sharpen the image either in post or while it is being compressed. I seem to recall that the box crashed 2 or 3 times while we were working, but never during an actual capture, and the crashes didn't require a hardware restart, only a software one so they didn't cause us any real problems.

Sitting on set capturing the box was great. One really gets the sense that this is the future of filmmaking. Can't wait for the touch screen and other features on the wafian box to get up and running.

ftp://www.atomic-vfx.com/spoon_test_clips/

Let me know if there are any problems accessing the files.

ciao
sharlto

Technical_01: Cables and Storage

Here it comes, Ladies and Gentlemen…

Finally the Atomic VFX guys have started posting something.
If it is useful – great, if it is not useful or
something in your opinion not true – post a comment please.

Storage:
Statistically speaking if you want to make a 100 minute movie, you shoot about 700. Not true anymore. Now it is all digital. Our last “Test Shoot – Day 1” showed that we end up shooting a lot more just because we can… We can view footage on set straight away. If a director isn’t happy, no problem: let’s just have another take. And VT roll before camera, say up to 5 seconds - that is 150MB of wasted space, just like that. If this were uncompressed, it would be 1.1GB. Thank goodness for “CineForm” mathematics and support. Without them and with our independent budget, this project would never have kicked off from the start line.
In our case we will have a few shoots with special visual effects and some of them may be so important that we want them to be uncompressed anyway. For this we need at least 4 SATAII 7200rpm drives. However the motherboard must have SATAII support and all four drives must have the “3Gb/s” switch enabled. Stripe them together and “Hitachi” HDS725050KLA360 model will give 224MB/s. This just makes it - for real uncompressed we need 221MB/s. But hold your horses; “Wafian” is planning to release a software update with uncompressed capture ability (to RAM with 24p extraction option). This means that we don’t need unsecured RAID0 configuration and we can stick to the RAID10 that is on the “Wafian” already. If we plan our shoots carefully, we will have the entire movie on each box (930GB is about 9 hours of “CineForm” footage).

Cables:
Yes cables, not satellite transmission. With 221MB/s from component output of “JVC” GY-HD100E camcorder, it is still too expensive to transmit data wirelessly. So we decided to use normal off-the-shelf coaxial cable. When we started there was no component capture card on the market, so we used “AJA’s” HD10A HD-SDI converter and captured the feed from that. “Wafian” now have a “AJA’s” video capture card with component input that saves us having to use the extra conversion. We can now take the feed directly from the camera into the ingest box. What I discovered is that digital data requires very expensive cables to transmit over long distances: with SMPTE292 cable the maximum distance will be under 26 meters. Over that length the capacitance and resistance of the cable starts filtering out the higher harmonics of the digital signal. This results in the digital square wave becoming rounded and ultimately impossible to read accurately. The analog signal from the component output can run much further because it does not contain the high harmonics of the digital signal. But the analog signal can easily pick up external junk like electromagnetic interference from the generator. Such a sensitive cable is better to pull last and take away first and run over 20cm away from any power cables on the floor. However, it is still easier to pull 30 meters of cable to the camera on the middle of the set rather than moving the entire VT system closer to the camera.
The most important factor that we found on set is the quality of the cable itself. Don’t save money on things that are cheap anyway. We used two sets of the cable, flexible and non-flexible… Non-flexible breaks too easily, after 3 hours of heavy usage only.